IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER WINDOWS FULL

In a JPEG the storage space is 8 bits per each channel Red, Green, and Blue so 24 bits (8 x 3 = 24).

IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER WINDOWS FULL

When a raw file is converted to an RGB file the number of pixels remains the same but each pixel is now a full color pixel with a Red, Green and Blue channel and the required storage space. X-E2 RAF files average around 32 mb and that extra space is for the file metadata.

The division by 8 is to get bits into bytes (8 bits in a byte) and so we get a 28 megabyte RAF file. In a raw file each pixel is either red, green or blue and in the X-E2 14 bits of storage are provided.ДЎ6,269,056 x 14 = 227,766,784 / 8 = 28,470,848 and that's the raw file size. It saves photos that are 3296 X 4936 pixels give or take a few for lens correction adjustment.ДЈ296 x 4936 = 16,269,056 and there's the X-E2's 16 megapixel image size. The X-E2 is a 16 megapixel camera with a 14 bit ADC. Maybe it would help to actually run the math as an example. Increased bit depth storage is increased discrimination - a finer gradient - but may cover the same dynamic range in say a 12 versus 14 bit system. Increased bit depth storage is not necessarily increased dynamic range storage although the two tend to go hand in hand. The X-T2 and X-E2 mentioned in this thread store data at 14 bits per pixel. That bit depth varies one camera to the next but typically ranges between 10 to 14 bits. When the analog signal from a sensor is converted to digital values in the cameras ADC (analog digital converter), digital storage space is assigned per pixel at a specific bit depth. Modern sensors have a dynamic range of about 10 to 12 stops not bits. In order to keep the file size down, you can specify a file format that allows for intermediate bit-depths (probably what the RAF file does), chop of a few bits, compress the file or a combination of these things (no idea what they do for the 10-bit DNG). I think, I read a while ago that the DNG file format is very close to the TIF format, so in addition to the full dynamic range information from your sensor you get a whole bunch of 0's as well, which then blows up your file size. So 10 or 12 bits from the sensor need to be put into a 16 bit file, but that leads to 4 - 6 bits that need to be padded with 0's (empty information). Now, AFAIK the TIF specification only allows for 8 or 16 bits of information to be stored in a TIF file. Modern camera sensors have a dynamic range of about 10 - 12 bits (that roughly means they can distinguish between 2^10 to 2^12 or 1024 to 4096 intensity values). DNG file sizes, I guess, it depends how these different file formats handle 'empty' information. Regarding the 10-bit- vs 16-bit and the RAF vs.

Iridient x-transformer windows